An Emerald’s Fire is book 5 of the “Migrations of the Heart” series and deals with an issue that increased in popularity between the World Wars. Many are familiar with the ways that Nazi -era Germany sought to use selection as a way to create a master race and to rid themselves of “undesirables.” However, many are not aware of the history of eugenics in this country as a way to control the population. According to Professor Robert Rydell, eugenics is a science that advocates improving inherited qualities of a race by controlling mating. Many are aware of these experiments were conducted in Nazi Germany, but it was a very popular theory here in the United States. By the 1920’s people thought it enough of a branch of science for it to be included in high school textbooks.
In 1915 in San Francisco, Mary Watts organized an exhibit at the world’s fair called “Fitter Families for Future Firesides.” (the picture is from the exhibit). Quite alliterative, but the purpose of the exhibit was to show how certain people had desirable characteristics to be passed on into the population. The darker side of eugenics involves the control of the bodies of the “feeble-minded” as well as those who were not of the most desired race. So these practices disproportionately involved African American people as well as special needs individuals. An Emerald’s Fire asks the question of what happens when these policies impact someone who is both special needs and African American. The controlled practice most used was sterilization.
In 1924, Virginia passed the Racial Integrity Act citing the need for sterilization to prevent a drain on state monies. As a result of these acts in Virginia and other places, 60,000 people were sterilized against their will before the 1950’s. What stopped them? According to Rydell, word of the Holocaust leaked out of Germany just after World War II and Americans began to question their practices of racial prejudice. Sterilization, as a method of control, fell away in practice but the laws were not repealed for many years after that.
Should human beings decide what constitutes a quality life or is that for God to decide? What does a family do when they believe that are helping a loved one live a better life, but that person disagrees with the idea? These are the central questions of An Emerald’s Fire. It’s the conflict that threatens to tear the Bledsoe sisters apart–forever.
I am living in a state where eugenics was in practice through the 1970s. The 70s. Ugh.
Yep, Julie. It went on for far too long, with cases that have come up more recently than that. Definite ugh. Thanks for stopping by.
Piper, you take on some of the most interesting (and often frightening) topics. So much has changed (mostly for the better) even in my lifetime, but we don’t want to forget the past. I’m so looking forward to reading your books.
I heartily agree with you that eugenics is a frightening topic, but while I’m out here being radical, I might as well go all the way right??? I hope you get to read my books soon as well. Thank you for stopping by and leaving a comment today!
Love the title of your 5th book. I admit I’d always thought of eugenics taking place in dictatorships. You’re doing us a great favor to educate us on such things.
Thanks, cp. I thought the title was a bit corny at first, but it’s growing on me. And I appreciate you calling it favor–I just think it’s what I was created to do…Thanks for stopping by!
I knew some of the eugenics history because of the pro-life movement. You’re right. the question of who decides is an extremely dangerous one. Everyone always assumes such things will only be applied judiciously to people who need it. What a great conflict for a book! I can’t wait until your books are available.
And when a special needs African American woman dares to question who gets to decide…well, that is something else again. Thank you for your supportive comments, Louise! I appreciate that you stopped by!